European Journal of Environment and Public Health

Evaluation of Indoor Radiation Hazard on Worker & Public Health in Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Md. Ahshan Habib 1, Mohammad Sohelur Rahman 2 * , Pretam Kumar Das 1, Shudeb Kumar Roy 1, Selina Yeasmin 1
More Detail
1 Department of Physics, Pabna University of Science and Technology, BANGLADESH
2 Health Physics Division, Atomic Energy Centre Dhaka-1000, BANGLADESH
* Corresponding Author
Research Article

European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 2021 - Volume 5 Issue 1, Article No: em0061
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph/8576

Published Online: 07 Oct 2020

Views: 197 | Downloads: 69

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Habib et al., 2021)
Reference: Habib, M. A., Rahman, M. S., Das, P. K., Roy, S. K., & Yeasmin, S. (2021). Evaluation of Indoor Radiation Hazard on Worker & Public Health in Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 5(1), em0061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph/8576
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Habib MA, Rahman MS, Das PK, Roy SK, Yeasmin S. Evaluation of Indoor Radiation Hazard on Worker & Public Health in Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. EUROPEAN J ENV PUBLI. 2021;5(1):em0061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph/8576
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Habib MA, Rahman MS, Das PK, Roy SK, Yeasmin S. Evaluation of Indoor Radiation Hazard on Worker & Public Health in Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. EUROPEAN J ENV PUBLI. 2021;5(1), em0061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph/8576
Chicago
In-text citation: (Habib et al., 2021)
Reference: Habib, Md. Ahshan, Mohammad Sohelur Rahman, Pretam Kumar Das, Shudeb Kumar Roy, and Selina Yeasmin. "Evaluation of Indoor Radiation Hazard on Worker & Public Health in Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh". European Journal of Environment and Public Health 2021 5 no. 1 (2021): em0061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph/8576
Harvard
In-text citation: (Habib et al., 2021)
Reference: Habib, M. A., Rahman, M. S., Das, P. K., Roy, S. K., and Yeasmin, S. (2021). Evaluation of Indoor Radiation Hazard on Worker & Public Health in Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 5(1), em0061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph/8576
MLA
In-text citation: (Habib et al., 2021)
Reference: Habib, Md. Ahshan et al. "Evaluation of Indoor Radiation Hazard on Worker & Public Health in Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh". European Journal of Environment and Public Health, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, em0061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph/8576
ABSTRACT
Objective: Radiation workers in nuclear Medicine institute are handling unsealed radioactive materials for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of patients and thus radiation hazard on workers and public health in nuclear medicine is high comparing to other departments of the hospital. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the radiation hazard on workers and public at the indoor places of the Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Allied Sciences (INMAS) Mitford, Sir Salimullah Medical College and Hospital Campus based on the real-time radiation monitoring data. Methods: The radiation monitoring was performed using a real-time portable digital radiation monitoring device. This real-time digital portable radiation monitoring device meets all European CE standards as well as the American “FCC 15 standard”. The portable digital radiation monitoring device was placed at 1 meter above the ground on tripod and data acquisition time for each monitoring point (MP) was 1 hour. 24 MPs were selected for collection of radiation dose rates at different indoor locations of INMAS, Mitford hospital from May-June 2019. The real-time dose rate also monitored at 1 meter distance from injected patients in the patient’s waiting room after injecting 99mTc & 131I. Results: The measured dose rates were ranged from 0.181 ± 0.057 μSv.h-1 to 2.247 ± 0.685 μSv.h-1 with an average of 0.463 ± 0.695 μSv.h-1. The annual effective dose to the radiation worker and public were varied from 0.279 ± 0.089 mSv to 3.481±1.061 mSv with an average of 0.717 ±1.077mSv. Excess life-time cancer risk (ELCR) of worker and public were evaluated based on annual effective dose and varied from 1.113 Χ 10-3 to 1.385 Χ 10-2. Conclusion: Real-time radiation monitoring at indoor places of nuclear medicine facilities are required for detection of contamination in the workplace. So this study is needed to keep the indoor environment free from radiation hazard and thereby improving the worker and public health.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  • Almén, A., Richter, S. and Leitz, W. (2008). Number of radiological examinations in Sweden. Swedish Radiation Protection Authority Report, 3 (in Swedish). Available at: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/39/043/39043574.pdf?r=1
  • Barrall, R. C., et al. (1976). Personnel radiation exposure and protection from 99mTc radiations in: Biophysical aspects of the medical use of technetium-99m, Kereiakes, J. G. and Corey, K. R. (eds.), AAPM Monograph No. 1. American Institute of Physics (p.77), New York.
  • Borgen, L. and Stranden, E. (2014). Radiation knowledge and perception of referral practice among radiologists and radiographers compared with referring clinicians. Insights into Imaging, 5, 635-640. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13244-014-0348-y
  • Bouraoui, S., Mougou, S., Drira, A., Tabka, F., Bouali, N., Mrizek, N., Elghezal, H. and Saad, A. (2013). Cytogenetic approach to the effects of low levels of ionizing radiation (IR) on the exposed Tunisian hospital workers. Int J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health, 26(1), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-013-0084-4
  • EURATOM (1997). Council directive 97/43, on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 180/22. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/en/TXT/uri=CELEX%3A31997L0043 (Accessed: 17 July 2020).
  • Fazel, R., Krumholz, H. M., Wang, Y., Ross, J. S., Chen, J., Ting, H. H. … Nallamothu, B. K. (2009). Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N. Engl. J. Med., 361(9), 849-857. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
  • Geletu, G. M., Abiko, F. and Sahlu, S. (2017). Implementation of a radiation protection system at four hospitals in Ethiopia. J. Radiol. Radiat. Ther., 5(1), 1069. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1905/1905.07271.pdf
  • Harb, S. (2016). Evaluation of radiation doses and radiation risk in Teaching Sohag Hospital, Egypt. Journal of Nuclear and Particle Physics, 6(4), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jnpp.20160604.03
  • Hricak, H., Brenner, D. J., James Adelstein, S., Frush, D. P., Hall, E. J., Howell, R. W…. Wagner, L. K. (2011). Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multi-faceted challenge. Radiology, 258(3), 889-905. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10101157
  • ICRP (2007). Recommendations of the ICRP: Annals of the ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection), 37, 2-4 (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). Available at: https://www.icrp.org/page.asp?id=7
  • ICRP (2008). Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals - Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53, ICRP Publication 106, Ann. ICRP 38, 1–2 (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). Available at: https://www.icrp.org/page.asp?id=7
  • Information about Bangladesh (2019). Available at: http://en.worldstat.info/Asia/Bangladesh (Accessed: 30 August 2019).
  • James, I. U., Moses, I. F., Vandi, J. N. and Ikoh, U. E. (2015). Measurement of indoor and outdoor background ionizing radiation levels of Kwali General Hospital, Abuja. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage., 19(1), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v19i1.12
  • Jwanbot, D. I., Izam, M. M., Nyam, G. G. and Agada, I. S. (2012). Evaluation of indoor background ionizing radiation profile in some hospitals in Jos Plateau state, Nigeria. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 2(7), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.7176/JNSR
  • Stenstad, L.-I., Pedersen, G. A., Landmark, A. D. and Brattheim, B. (2014). Nuclear radiation dose to the surroundings from patients who are undergoing nuclear medicine examinations. Radiography Open, 1(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.1196
  • Dobrzyn´ska, M. M., Pachocki, K. A., Gajowik, A., Radzikowska, J. and Sackiewicz, A. (2014). The effect of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation on the DNA damage in peripheral blood leukocytes of nuclear medicine personal. J. Occup. Health, 56(5), 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.13-0287-OA
  • Javed, M., Ur Rahman, S., Tanveer, I., Asghar, G., Fatima, S. and Fahim, M. (2017). Measurement of radiation doses to occupational workers in nuclear medicine. Pakistan Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 7(1), 16-19. https://doi.org/10.24911/PJNMED.7.3
  • NCRP (1990). National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Implementation of the principle of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) for medical and dental personnel. NCRP Report No. 107, (Bethesda, USA). Available at: https://ncrponline.org/
  • NSRC (1997). The Nuclear Safety and Radiation Control (NSRC) Rules of Bangladesh (SRO No. 205-Law/97).
  • Okoye, P. C. and Avwiri, G. O. (2013). Evaluation of background ionizing radiation levels of Braithwaite Memorial Specialist Hospital Port Harcourt, Rivers State. Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 4(4), 359-365. https://doi.org/10.5251/ajsir.2013.4.4.359.365
  • Owner’s Manual (2007). GARMIN eTrex HC Series. Available at: https://static.garmincdn.com/pumac/eTrexLegendHCx_OwnersManual.pdf
  • Abu Zer, S. S., Khadoura, K. J., Yassin, S. S., Al Agha, M. R. (2016). Ionizing radiation leakage in radio-diagnostic centers at Gaza Strip Hospitals, Palestine. Asian Review of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 3(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.506/2016.3.1/506.1.18.26
  • UNSCEAR (2000). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes (New York: United Nations, United Nations Sales Publication E.00.IX.3). Available at: https://www.unscear.org/
  • UNSCEAR (1993). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes (New York: United Nations). Available at: https://www.unscear.org/
  • UNSCEAR (2008). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, volume I, Annex A: Medical radiation exposures (New York: United Nations, United Nations Publication Sales No.E.10.XI.3). Available at: https://www.unscear.org/
  • UNSCEAR (1982). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Ionizing radiation: sources and biological effects. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, (New York: United Nations E82. IX.8). Available at: https://www.unscear.org/
  • UNSCEAR (1988). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation, (United Nations, New York). Available at: https://www.unscear.org/
  • User Manual GAMMA SCOUT (2014). Available at: https://www.gamma-scout.com/EN/Handbuch.php
  • Wall, B. F. and Hart, D. (1997). Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations: report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. British Journal of Radiology, 70, 437-439. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227222
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.