European Journal of Environment and Public Health

Prioritization of Factors that Determine Medical Practice Styles Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Sedat Bostan 1, Gokhan Agac 2 * , Saime Sahinoz 3
More Detail
1 Department of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TURKEY
2 Department of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, TURKEY
3 Ordu University
* Corresponding Author
Research Article

European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 2022 - Volume 6 Issue 1, Article No: em0100
https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11558

Published Online: 14 Jan 2022

Views: 91 | Downloads: 50

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Bostan et al., 2022)
Reference: Bostan, S., Agac, G., & Sahinoz, S. (2022). Prioritization of Factors that Determine Medical Practice Styles Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 6(1), em0100. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11558
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Bostan S, Agac G, Sahinoz S. Prioritization of Factors that Determine Medical Practice Styles Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. EUROPEAN J ENV PUBLI. 2022;6(1):em0100. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11558
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Bostan S, Agac G, Sahinoz S. Prioritization of Factors that Determine Medical Practice Styles Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. EUROPEAN J ENV PUBLI. 2022;6(1), em0100. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11558
Chicago
In-text citation: (Bostan et al., 2022)
Reference: Bostan, Sedat, Gokhan Agac, and Saime Sahinoz. "Prioritization of Factors that Determine Medical Practice Styles Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process". European Journal of Environment and Public Health 2022 6 no. 1 (2022): em0100. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11558
Harvard
In-text citation: (Bostan et al., 2022)
Reference: Bostan, S., Agac, G., and Sahinoz, S. (2022). Prioritization of Factors that Determine Medical Practice Styles Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 6(1), em0100. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11558
MLA
In-text citation: (Bostan et al., 2022)
Reference: Bostan, Sedat et al. "Prioritization of Factors that Determine Medical Practice Styles Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process". European Journal of Environment and Public Health, vol. 6, no. 1, 2022, em0100. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11558
ABSTRACT
The medical profession has maintained its importance throughout human history. Communication between physician and patient is one of the most important issues that determine the success of the medical profession. In this success, physician behaviors and styles play a determining role in the practice of medicine. The aim of this study is to determine the factor weights affecting the practice styles in medicine and to prioritize them. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used in the study. The AHP technique is helpful for the decision maker as it prioritizes the factors based on their weights using a pairwise comparison matrix. The factor comparison data are obtained from a total of 22 clinician specialist physicians. According to the results of the application, the factors determining the practice style are Professional Experience (31.9%), Medical Education (21.8%), Patient and Disease (18.2%), Personality (11.5%), Institution (8.8%), and Family and Social Environment (7.8%), respectively. The concept of medical styles aimed to contribute to the development of the physicians’ own styles and to create awareness. It is expected to contribute to medical education and professional development.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  • Akkas E. and Erdem R. (2017). An evaluation on determining the cases of medical professional culture. Suleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 8(17), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.296310
  • Bertakis, K. D., Callahan, E. J., Helms, L. J., Azari, R., Robbins, J. A. and Miller J. (1998). Physician practice styles and patient outcomes: Differences between family practice and general internal medicine. Medical Care, 36(6), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199806000-00011
  • Bhushan, N. and Rai, K. (2004). Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97668
  • Bostan, S. (2017). A research on the relationship between performance and medicine styles. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences, 2(2), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2017-56269
  • Brown, J. (2008). How clinical communication has become a corepart of medical education in the UK. Medical Education, 42(3), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02955.x
  • Buckman, R. and Kason, Y. (1992). How to break bad news. A guide for health care professionals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487596989
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130904
  • Epstein, A. J. and Nicholson, S. (2009). The formation and evolution of physician treatment styles: An application to cesarean sections. Journal of Health Economics, 28(6), 1126-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.08.003
  • Fletcher, I., McCallum, R. and Peters, S. (2016). Attachment styles and clinical communication performance in trainee doctors. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(11), 1852-1857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.019
  • Freidson, E. (1984). The changing nature of professional control. Annual Review of Sociology, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.000245
  • Gude, T., Vaglum, P., Anvik, T., Baerheim, A., Eide, H., Fasmer, O. B., et al. (2007). Observed communication skills: How do they relate to the consultation content? A nation-wide study of graduate medical students seeing a standardized patient for a first-time consultation in a general practice setting. BMC Medical Education, 7(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-7-43
  • Hajar, R. (2015). History of Medicine Timeline. Heart Views, 16(1), 43-45. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.153008
  • Hall, J. A. (2003). Some observations on provider-patient communication research. Patient Education and Counseling, 50(1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00072-7
  • Kimball, C. P. (1982). The biopsychosocial approach to the patient. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  • Mast, M. S., Hall, J. A. and Roter, D. L. (2007). Disentangling physician sex and physician communication style: Their effects on patient satisfaction in a virtual medical visit. Patient Education and Counseling, 68(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.020
  • Musson, D. M. (2003). Personality determinants of professional culture: Evidence from astronauts, pilots and physicians [PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin].
  • Oguz, N. Y. (1995). Physician-patient relationship in clinical practice. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Ethics-Law-History, 3(2), 59-65.
  • Ozlu, T. (2007). In the context of mutual rights and responsibilities physician-patient relationship. Health Law Symposium Notes from A to Z, 20-28.
  • Roter, D. L., Hall, J. A. and Aoki, Y. (2002). Physician gender effects in medical communication. A meta-analytic Review. JAMA, 288(6), 756-764. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.6.756
  • Roter, D., Hall, J. A. and Katz, N. R. (1987). Relations between physicians’ behaviors and simulated patients’ satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Medical Care, 25(5), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198705000-00007
  • Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1984). The analytic hierarchy process: Decision making in complex environments. In R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (Eds.), Quantitative assessment in arms control (pp. 285-308). Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12
  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  • Straus, E. W. and Straus, A. (2018). Medical marvels: The 100 greatest advances in medicine. Buffalo: Prometheus Publishing.
  • Taylor, K. (2009). Paternalism, participation and partnership - the evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(2), 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.017
  • von Fragstein, M., Silverman, J., Cushing, A., Quilligan, S., Salisbury, H. and Wiskin, C. (2008). UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Medical Education, 42, 1100-1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03137.x
  • Wass, V. (2005). Doctors in society. Medical professionalism in a changing world. Clinical Medicine Journal, 5(6 Suppl 1), 109-113. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16408403/
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.